RESPONSABILIDADE CIVIL DO ESTADO POR DANOS DE CORRENTES DO EXERCÍCIO DA FUNÇÃO JURISDICIONAL: REGIME JURÍDICO-SUBSTANTIVO E JURÍDICO PROCESSUAL

Francisco Manuel Lucas Ferreira de Almeida

Authors

  • Francisco Manuel Lucas Ferreira de Almeida University of Coimbra image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53456/dlb.vi.7443

Abstract

The court ruling addresses the matter of the State’s liability for damages arisen through the exercise of a judicial function, based on judiciary error. The ruling concluded that, as pre-requisite for said liability, unlawfulness must arise from the previous revocation of the detrimental decision by the competent jurisdiction. This revocation entails the judicial recognition of error with its characteristics in manifest when it is of law, or but grossly when it is of fact. The commentary grounds itself on the fact that the new legal regime (came into force January 1st 2020) did away with the distinction between decisions (purportedly) in breach of European Law and decision (allegedly) in breach of National Law, by making appealable for review any decision made final on the basis of (recognized) judiciary error.

 

Published

2021-01-29

How to Cite

“RESPONSABILIDADE CIVIL DO ESTADO POR DANOS DE CORRENTES DO EXERCÍCIO DA FUNÇÃO JURISDICIONAL: REGIME JURÍDICO-SUBSTANTIVO E JURÍDICO PROCESSUAL: Francisco Manuel Lucas Ferreira de Almeida”. 2021. De Legibus - Law Journal, January, 34. https://doi.org/10.53456/dlb.vi.7443.