PARECER SOBRE A INTERPRETAÇÃO DO ARTIGO 942.º, N.º 4, DO CÓDIGO DE PROCESSO CIVIL: (Cabe recurso de revista da decisão sobre a existência da obrigação de prestar contas?)

Jorge  Sinde Monteiro; Maria José Capelo

doi:10.60543/ul-plr-rdul-p.v14i1.7477

OPINION ON THE INTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE 942(4) OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

(Is there an appeal against the review of the decision on the existence of the obligation to render an account?)

Authors

Jorge Sinde Monteiro Lusófona University of Porto
Maria José Capelo University of Coimbra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60543/ul-plr-rdul-p.v14i1.7477

Abstract

Summary

Introductory. Method Issues
1. Brief history of the precept
2. Interpretation of Article 942(4): the relevance of setting the rise mode and the effect of the appeal
3. The application of the general rules on the admissibility of appeals against decisions at first instance
4. The admissibility of a review appeal in the special reporting procedure
CONCLUSIONS

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46294/ulplr-rdulp.v14i1.7477

Author Biographies

Jorge Sinde Monteiro, Lusófona University of Porto

Professor Catedrático Jubilado da FDUC, Professor da FDCP da ULP.
Maria José Capelo, University of Coimbra

Professora Associada da FDUC.