Políticas e práticas de habitação social: visão dos assistentes sociais
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60543/ts_iss.vi7.9656Keywords:
Políticas de habitação, Papel do serviço social, Visão dos assistentes sociaisAbstract
The profound changes in society have promoted shifts in housing policies linked to the sociocultural transformations of individuals' lives, increasingly challenging Social Services to adopt a critical, structuralist, and mediation-oriented practice in facilitating access. The new generation of housing policies offers innovative tools in an attempt to alleviate the structural problem of housing rights conditioning in Portugal. Currently, policies have alternated between the direct promotion of housing (such as construction in situations of housing shortage among insolvent social strata) and indirect promotion (through the provision of financial assistance and tax benefits as well as support for home ownership) (Matos, 2001; Serra, 2002; Antunes, 2018). In the scope of this article, we were interested in the perspective of Social Workers on how the real possibilities of access are perceived within the framework of new policies and potential transformations in the field of practices. How do professionals perceive the changes in housing policy? What are the theories of practice? How does it articulate with universalist resources/policies capable of reinforcing the right to housing? Methodologically, we organized the research as case studies, mobilizing qualitative methods to study practices and access views in 4 municipalities in the northern region of Portugal. The research revealed positive views of policy transformation, notably due to the leveraging of new resources that increase access. Professionals reproduce an approach close to classical, individualistic-reformist views, of an assistance-oriented type, heavily supported by municipal regulations. It is understood that the scarcity of resources has triggered a normative and technocratic professionalism, at the expense of reflective and critical stances, of political mediation. The narrative of effectiveness and efficiency does not always correspond to empirical evidence. It is important for social workers to adopt an alternative paradigm of practices that emphasizes mediation, given that the housing problem is a structural issue.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Open Access Policy
Temas Sociais Journal is an open access journal, providing free, immediate and unrestricted access to its contents, with the aim of promoting the circulation of scientific knowledge and academic exchange at national and international levels.
By submitting their manuscripts, authors authorize the publication, dissemination and public communication of their work within the scope of the journal, while retaining full responsibility for the content of the submitted manuscripts.
Copyright
Authors retain copyright over their works and grant Temas Sociais Journal the right to publish, reproduce, disseminate and archive the contents in digital format, in accordance with the journal’s editorial policy and open access principles.
Any reuse of published content must comply with the conditions established by the journal and with applicable copyright legislation.
Code of Ethics and Good Practices
Temas Sociais Journal is committed to the ethical principles of research and scientific publishing, promoting academic integrity, editorial transparency, and equal opportunities in access to knowledge. To this end, it adopts the following Code of Ethics and Good Practices:
-
Submitted manuscripts must be original, unpublished, and of exclusive authorship, and must not have been previously published, disseminated, or submitted to another journal.
-
Authors are responsible for obtaining all necessary permissions for the publication of their work and for properly acknowledging all sources and references used.
-
Research resulting from external funding must ensure, where applicable, authorization for the dissemination of the results.
-
All submitted manuscripts are subject to plagiarism detection, using the tool in force at the Universidade Lusófona – Centro Universitário de Lisboa.
-
Articles are evaluated by external peer reviewers with expertise in the relevant field, under a double-blind peer review system, ensuring the anonymity of both authors and reviewers throughout the process.
-
Research involving human participants must ensure informed consent, strict respect for data confidentiality, and, where applicable, approval by an Ethics Committee.
-
Authorship must reflect exclusively those individuals who have made a significant intellectual contribution to the conception and execution of the research, analysis of results, drafting of the manuscript, and approval of the final version.