Magazine-ification: a problem or a solution to journalism?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60543/3gq58t93Resumen
One of the most compelling insights that emerges from a magazine studies perspective is that several recent theoretical developments in journalism studies - such as the emotional turn (Wahl-Jorgensen, 2020), constructive journalism (Bro, 2019; Gyldensted, 2015; Haagerup, 2017; Hermans & Gyldensted, 2019), and solutions journalism (Lough & McIntyre, 2023; McIntyre, 2019; McIntyre & Lough, 2021) -, reflect
what might be described as the magazine-ification1 of journalism. Although treated naturally by some magazine studies scholars (Holmes, 2005; Ribeiro & Costa, 2024), the concept of magazine-ification - the process by which diverse social phenomena come to adopt characteristics traditionally associated with the magazine medium - has received little scholarly attention. Outside academia, the term is often used pejoratively (Strauss, 2013), while journalists continue to regard it as complex (Lynch & Pompeo, 2013).

