Resistência ao Fascismo e ao populismo
Da Rua às Redes Sociais, uma Análise das formas de Expressão e Contestação desde os anos 30 até a atualidade.
Abstract
This article analyzes the evolution of forms of resistance to fascism and populism, from street demonstrations and art in the 1930s to digital activism on social media today. Through bibliographic and documentary research, the study examines the different resistance strategies, comparing the characteristics, potentialities, and challenges of each form of expression and contestation. The analysis reveals that, despite the differences in context and tools, resistance remains a constant struggle in defense of freedom, equality, and social justice. New technologies, especially social media, have profoundly impacted forms of resistance, expanding their reach, facilitating organization, and diversifying forms of expression. However, resistance in the digital age also faces challenges such as disinformation, polarization, and control. The study concludes that resistance to fascism and populism remains a necessary struggle, requiring courage, determination, and the strategic use of all available tools.
Downloads
Open Access Policy:
The Journal facilitates free, open and immediate access to its contents to foster the exchange of knowledge at a global level.
By submitting their work, the author(s) authorise the publication and dissemination of their work and are responsible for its content.
Code of Ethics:
The Journal is a digital tool that enables the dissemination of knowledge in a globalised society where technology, communication and information occupy a prominent place. The publication promotes equal opportunities facilitated by knowledge. To this end, the Journal is committed to the content it publishes, adopting a code of ethics based on the following principles:
1. The texts received must be original, by the author(s) alone and unpublished, i.e. they must not have been previously published, broadcast or sent to another publication.
2. Authors are responsible for requesting any authorisations necessary to publish their texts, with the respective reference to the sources consulted.
3. That organisation must authorise work funded by an organisation to disseminate the results.
4. the plagiarism detection tool in force will review all work received at Universidade Lusófona - Centro Universitário de Lisboa.
5. The articles received will be evaluated by two experts in the field, guaranteeing the anonymity of the author(s) and the evaluators.
6. Papers involving people as the research subject must obtain informed consent from all of them, with strict respect for the confidentiality of personal data and, if necessary, the decision of the Ethics Committee.
7. The list of authors should only include those who contributed intellectually to the work, i.e., who designed and carried out the research, wrote up and analysed the results and approved the final version of the text.
