Sustentabilidade económico-financeira das instituições particulares de solidariedade social - paralisia cerebral
https://doi.org/10.53809/TS_ISS_2023_n.4_190-213
Abstract
The main objective of this investigation is to study the factories that could jeopardize the sustainability of IPSS, in the area of disability and in particular, cerebral Palsy. For that, the quantitative method was used through a questionnaire by survey and by the analysis of the balance she ets and income statements .The interpretation of these results, it is intended to determine which are the factors of sustainability, which are the risk zones they face namely indebtedness, to identify the areas likely to create value, formulate possible recommendations, and prioritize initiatives for the implementation of a transformation program.This study also sought to innovate creating a guiding and limiting framework for zones at risk of loss of sustainability, a map that could be used by IPSS technicians, to detect the appearance of such symptoms.
Downloads
Open Access Policy:
The Journal facilitates free, open and immediate access to its contents to foster the exchange of knowledge at a global level.
By submitting their work, the author(s) authorise the publication and dissemination of their work and are responsible for its content.
Code of Ethics:
The Journal is a digital tool that enables the dissemination of knowledge in a globalised society where technology, communication and information occupy a prominent place. The publication promotes equal opportunities facilitated by knowledge. To this end, the Journal is committed to the content it publishes, adopting a code of ethics based on the following principles:
1. The texts received must be original, by the author(s) alone and unpublished, i.e. they must not have been previously published, broadcast or sent to another publication.
2. Authors are responsible for requesting any authorisations necessary to publish their texts, with the respective reference to the sources consulted.
3. That organisation must authorise work funded by an organisation to disseminate the results.
4. the plagiarism detection tool in force will review all work received at Universidade Lusófona - Centro Universitário de Lisboa.
5. The articles received will be evaluated by two experts in the field, guaranteeing the anonymity of the author(s) and the evaluators.
6. Papers involving people as the research subject must obtain informed consent from all of them, with strict respect for the confidentiality of personal data and, if necessary, the decision of the Ethics Committee.
7. The list of authors should only include those who contributed intellectually to the work, i.e., who designed and carried out the research, wrote up and analysed the results and approved the final version of the text.
