Ageing in Prison.
Challenges and Support Programs for Aging in Prisons – A Literature Review
Abstract
This study analyses the dynamics of ageing in a prison context, addressing the challenges faced by elderly prisoners and the effectiveness of social programmes aimed at improving their quality of life. Based on a systematic review of the literature, conducted according to the PRISMA protocol and covering 12 studies published between 2019 and 2024, five central dimensions were identified: insufficient infrastructure to meet the needs of this population, the impact of premature ageing on the prison environment, the limited effectiveness of social programmes, the need for palliative care, and structural and ethical barriers in the treatment of people with dementia. Despite some good practices, significant gaps remain in adapting policies and infrastructures. The conclusion is that ageing in prison requires urgent and integrated reforms that promote dignified ageing, health and social reintegration of older prisoners while ensuring full respect for their fundamental human rights.
Downloads
Open Access Policy:
The Journal facilitates free, open and immediate access to its contents to foster the exchange of knowledge at a global level.
By submitting their work, the author(s) authorise the publication and dissemination of their work and are responsible for its content.
Code of Ethics:
The Journal is a digital tool that enables the dissemination of knowledge in a globalised society where technology, communication and information occupy a prominent place. The publication promotes equal opportunities facilitated by knowledge. To this end, the Journal is committed to the content it publishes, adopting a code of ethics based on the following principles:
1. The texts received must be original, by the author(s) alone and unpublished, i.e. they must not have been previously published, broadcast or sent to another publication.
2. Authors are responsible for requesting any authorisations necessary to publish their texts, with the respective reference to the sources consulted.
3. That organisation must authorise work funded by an organisation to disseminate the results.
4. the plagiarism detection tool in force will review all work received at Universidade Lusófona - Centro Universitário de Lisboa.
5. The articles received will be evaluated by two experts in the field, guaranteeing the anonymity of the author(s) and the evaluators.
6. Papers involving people as the research subject must obtain informed consent from all of them, with strict respect for the confidentiality of personal data and, if necessary, the decision of the Ethics Committee.
7. The list of authors should only include those who contributed intellectually to the work, i.e., who designed and carried out the research, wrote up and analysed the results and approved the final version of the text.
