Políticas e práticas de habitação social: visão dos assistentes sociais
Abstract
The profound changes in society have promoted shifts in housing policies linked to the sociocultural transformations of individuals' lives, increasingly challenging Social Services to adopt a critical, structuralist, and mediation-oriented practice in facilitating access. The new generation of housing policies offers innovative tools in an attempt to alleviate the structural problem of housing rights conditioning in Portugal. Currently, policies have alternated between the direct promotion of housing (such as construction in situations of housing shortage among insolvent social strata) and indirect promotion (through the provision of financial assistance and tax benefits as well as support for home ownership) (Matos, 2001; Serra, 2002; Antunes, 2018). In the scope of this article, we were interested in the perspective of Social Workers on how the real possibilities of access are perceived within the framework of new policies and potential transformations in the field of practices. How do professionals perceive the changes in housing policy? What are the theories of practice? How does it articulate with universalist resources/policies capable of reinforcing the right to housing? Methodologically, we organized the research as case studies, mobilizing qualitative methods to study practices and access views in 4 municipalities in the northern region of Portugal. The research revealed positive views of policy transformation, notably due to the leveraging of new resources that increase access. Professionals reproduce an approach close to classical, individualistic-reformist views, of an assistance-oriented type, heavily supported by municipal regulations. It is understood that the scarcity of resources has triggered a normative and technocratic professionalism, at the expense of reflective and critical stances, of political mediation. The narrative of effectiveness and efficiency does not always correspond to empirical evidence. It is important for social workers to adopt an alternative paradigm of practices that emphasizes mediation, given that the housing problem is a structural issue.
Downloads
Open Access Policy:
The Journal facilitates free, open and immediate access to its contents to foster the exchange of knowledge at a global level.
By submitting their work, the author(s) authorise the publication and dissemination of their work and are responsible for its content.
Code of Ethics:
The Journal is a digital tool that enables the dissemination of knowledge in a globalised society where technology, communication and information occupy a prominent place. The publication promotes equal opportunities facilitated by knowledge. To this end, the Journal is committed to the content it publishes, adopting a code of ethics based on the following principles:
1. The texts received must be original, by the author(s) alone and unpublished, i.e. they must not have been previously published, broadcast or sent to another publication.
2. Authors are responsible for requesting any authorisations necessary to publish their texts, with the respective reference to the sources consulted.
3. That organisation must authorise work funded by an organisation to disseminate the results.
4. the plagiarism detection tool in force will review all work received at Universidade Lusófona - Centro Universitário de Lisboa.
5. The articles received will be evaluated by two experts in the field, guaranteeing the anonymity of the author(s) and the evaluators.
6. Papers involving people as the research subject must obtain informed consent from all of them, with strict respect for the confidentiality of personal data and, if necessary, the decision of the Ethics Committee.
7. The list of authors should only include those who contributed intellectually to the work, i.e., who designed and carried out the research, wrote up and analysed the results and approved the final version of the text.
