Proteção de crianças e jovens em Portugal: o que dizem ex-beneficiários, famílias, profissionais e investigadores?
Abstract
Although the remarks on child protection, some concerns request political action to ensure in fact the rights of the child. Literature has discussed proposals to support policymaking for reforming the Portuguese Child Protection System (CPS). This study, giving voice to CPS stakeholders, aims at assessing their level of agreement with proposals to reform the CPS and explore their positions. Research design used mixed methods, thus an online survey (n = 292), and focus groups conducted with CPS former beneficiaries, families, practitioners and academics (n = 18). Results present a clear alignment with the proposals, implicating a demanding reform towards a child-centred CPS. Emerged themes are discussed, as “Changes in legislation: strengthen family-based care”, “Changes in legislation: child-friendly justice” e “Changes in administration: restructuration of the CPS”. The conclusions highlight implications for policy.
Downloads
Open Access Policy
Temas Sociais Journal is an open access journal, providing free, immediate and unrestricted access to its contents, with the aim of promoting the circulation of scientific knowledge and academic exchange at national and international levels.
By submitting their manuscripts, authors authorize the publication, dissemination and public communication of their work within the scope of the journal, while retaining full responsibility for the content of the submitted manuscripts.
Copyright
Authors retain copyright over their works and grant Temas Sociais Journal the right to publish, reproduce, disseminate and archive the contents in digital format, in accordance with the journal’s editorial policy and open access principles.
Any reuse of published content must comply with the conditions established by the journal and with applicable copyright legislation.
Code of Ethics and Good Practices
Temas Sociais Journal is committed to the ethical principles of research and scientific publishing, promoting academic integrity, editorial transparency, and equal opportunities in access to knowledge. To this end, it adopts the following Code of Ethics and Good Practices:
-
Submitted manuscripts must be original, unpublished, and of exclusive authorship, and must not have been previously published, disseminated, or submitted to another journal.
-
Authors are responsible for obtaining all necessary permissions for the publication of their work and for properly acknowledging all sources and references used.
-
Research resulting from external funding must ensure, where applicable, authorization for the dissemination of the results.
-
All submitted manuscripts are subject to plagiarism detection, using the tool in force at the Universidade Lusófona – Centro Universitário de Lisboa.
-
Articles are evaluated by external peer reviewers with expertise in the relevant field, under a double-blind peer review system, ensuring the anonymity of both authors and reviewers throughout the process.
-
Research involving human participants must ensure informed consent, strict respect for data confidentiality, and, where applicable, approval by an Ethics Committee.
-
Authorship must reflect exclusively those individuals who have made a significant intellectual contribution to the conception and execution of the research, analysis of results, drafting of the manuscript, and approval of the final version.
