Criminal responsibility without alternative possibilities? The dilemma of freedom and the structure of ascription

  • brunomoura Universidade Lusófona de Lisboa
Keywords: criminal responsibility, free will, indeterminism, determinism, compatibilism, freedom of action, Principle of Alternative Possibilities (PAP), Source Model (SM), causing the conditions of one’s own lack of liability, extraordinary imputation

Abstract

This essay is about some connections between the idea according to which free will and determinism are mutually compatible and the fundamentals of criminal imputation. It is sustained that the Principle of Alternative Possibilities remains indispensable as a starting point, without damage to its integration into a broader model, able to cover those situations where the moral agent intentionally (at least by negligence) produces (or do not avoid) the conditions of his own lack of liability in ordinary or general terms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2022-01-31
How to Cite
Bruno de Oliveira Moura. 2022. “Criminal Responsibility Without Alternative Possibilities? The Dilemma of Freedom and the Structure of Ascription ”. De Legibus - Law Journal, no. 2 (January), 24. https://doi.org/10.24140/dlb.vi2.7878.