Cognitive demand in Mathematics curricula for ages 6 to 12 in Spain and Portugal: a comparative analysis
Abstract
The objective of this work is to identify the cognitive processes from Bloom's taxonomy as revised by Anderson and Krathwohl, which are present in the assessment criteria for Mathematics in one of Spain’s primary education curricula (specifically, that of the Autonomous Community of Galicia) and in the learning objectives of the Mathematics curriculum for the corresponding first six years of Basic Education in Portugal. The aim is to compare the distribution of these processes within each country and between them, in order to determine and contrast the cognitive demands required by both the criteria and the objectives. These educational periods correspond to students aged 6 to 12.
A preliminary document analysis is conducted, reviewing the current educational legislation in both countries, and a mixed methodology is used: qualitative regarding the cognitive processes, and quantitative for the statistical tests performed. A total of 294 assessment criteria and 619 learning objectives are reviewed.
The study concludes that the Spanish criteria and Portuguese objectives show different profiles and progression patterns over the educational period studied, with significant differences in the distribution of cognitive processes among topics in the Portuguese curriculum. On a scale from 0 to 10, the cognitive demand level is estimated at 4.6 in Portugal and 4.3 in Spain.
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Lusófona de Educação
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
-
Authors retain copyright of their work, without any payment, and grant the journal the right of first publication. The work is simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially), provided that proper credit is given to the author(s) and the initial publication in RLE is acknowledged.
-
Authors are permitted to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., depositing it in an institutional repository or publishing it as a book chapter), provided that authorship and initial publication in RLE are acknowledged.
-
Authors are allowed and encouraged to post and disseminate their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites), as this can increase the visibility and citation of the published work (see The Open Access Effect).
