Fostering critical thinking through peer review between cooperative learning groups
Abstract
Educational policies keep stressing the importance of critical thinking skills for promotion of academic success in Higher Education, to facilitate transition into the labour market and to foster livelong learning. Curricula in Higher Education Institutions gradually meet this necessity, integrating strategies foreseeing the development of critical thought in students. However, at this level, we still commonly found teaching and learning strategies emphasizing a more or less passive knowledge transfer, focusing on the student’s ability to memorize in- formation. Peer review and feedback, allied to cooperative work, are important components of active learning and development of critical thinking skills pro- cess. It is therefore important to understand the role and influence of feedback provision in peer review activities between cooperative groups. This study analyses the perceptions and attitudes of 27 students in two Masters Courses on the feedback given in peer review activities (between groups), based on their responses to a survey. Results showed, among other aspects, that collaborative work and feedback exchange between groups fostered the contact with different perspectives towards the same situation, and that its critical analysis allowed the students to enhance different skills, the most referred one being the critical thinking.
Keywords: critical thinking; cooperative learning; peer review.
Downloads
-
Authors retain copyright of their work, without any payment, and grant the journal the right of first publication. The work is simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially), provided that proper credit is given to the author(s) and the initial publication in RLE is acknowledged.
-
Authors are permitted to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., depositing it in an institutional repository or publishing it as a book chapter), provided that authorship and initial publication in RLE are acknowledged.
-
Authors are allowed and encouraged to post and disseminate their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites), as this can increase the visibility and citation of the published work (see The Open Access Effect).





